Multi-client intake
Official accounts, ownership context, authorized partners, exclusions, urgency, and contact preferences are recorded separately for every creator before enforcement begins.
Content protection for creator agencies
Rightsignal helps agencies, managers, and studios organize multiple creators without mixing identities, authorizations, evidence, targets, or results. Each case remains isolated while reporting and priority decisions stay understandable at roster level.
Official accounts, ownership context, authorized partners, exclusions, urgency, and contact preferences are recorded separately for every creator before enforcement begins.
Creator identities, private source files, target URLs, notices, responses, and evidence remain separated so one roster member's information is not exposed through another case.
Urgent leaks, impersonation, repeat sources, search exposure, and high-impact targets can be queued by creator, platform, route, or operational priority.
Agencies can understand active cases, submitted targets, confirmed changes, pending work, remaining-live items, and creators requiring new authorization or evidence.
Agency workflow
We define which creators, platforms, target types, reporting rights, exclusions, approval steps, and communication contacts belong in the engagement.
Each roster member receives separate source proof, target groups, authorization records, platform routes, current status, and confidentiality boundaries.
Eligible copyright, platform, host, infrastructure, impersonation, search, and monitoring actions are prioritized without turning the roster into one bulk complaint.
Case updates, target status, evidence context, recurring work, and follow-up needs are organized for operational review and client communication.
Reporting structure
A focused record of that creator's targets, submissions, confirmed results, pending routes, remaining-live items, and requests for additional proof.
During the agreed service period, the agency receives one manually prepared report each week through one agreed agency contact. An automated multi-client dashboard is not included in this pilot.
Report fields, approval flow, priority rules and scope are defined for the agreed creator list. Each creator's records remain separate.
Weekly manual report
Findings are reviewed for the relevant creator, reference material, authority, permitted uses and duplicates before eligible notices are prepared. Recurring monitoring adds reviewed discovery within the agreed scope, not an automatic complaint for every match.
Each target retains its creator reference, reporting route, submission record if any and provider response. A submitted notice is an action, not proof of removal.
Observed source availability and search visibility are recorded separately with the check time and access limits. A login barrier is not a removal; a 404 does not prove permanent worldwide deletion.
The report shows unresolved targets, holds, next steps and the remaining agreed allowance. Weekly reporting does not add extra enforcement actions or rechecks to the selected package.
DEMO report structure only. Example fields: creator reference; target ID; reviewed route; last action; source check; search check; next decision. No real creators, submissions or removal results are shown.
Engagement options
The selected package's total target allowance applies to the agreed creator list. It is not multiplied by the number of creators. Changes to the creator list or target queue are checked against the agreed scope and remaining allowance. Repeat checks of the same target are not new completed targets.
For a known set of creators and targets with a fixed review period, agreed priority list, route map, and status report after rechecks.
For multiple creators facing concurrent leaks, fake profiles, file hosts, channels, forums, adult sites, or search exposure.
For repeat discovery, new-target review, recurring takedown workflows, follow-up, and periodic summaries across an active roster.
Agency resources
Common questions
Not automatically. Ownership, representation, reporting authority, approved signatures, and platform requirements may differ by creator and route. Authorization should be documented before notices are sent.
No white-label delivery is promised by this page. Branding, client communication, reporting format, approvals, and operational ownership must be explicitly agreed during scope review.
No. Eligibility and outcomes depend on ownership, jurisdiction, publication context, platform rules, operator response, and available evidence. Rightsignal does not guarantee universal removal or fixed timelines.